ESSAY 04

Nakae Toju — A Village Teacher

I. Teaching in Old Japan

"What kind of schooling had you in Japan before we Westerners came to save you?

You Japanese seem to be the cleverest set of people among heathen,

and you must have had some training, moral and intellectual, to make you what you have been and are."

Such are the questions, and oftentimes their tone,

put to us by some civilized Westerners,

when some of us appeared in their midst, fresh from our country.

To which our answer has been somewhat as follows:

"Yes, we had schooling, and considerable of it.

We believe, at least, eight out of the Ten Commandments we learnt from the lips of our fathers while in our mothers' laps.

We knew that might is not right,

that the universe does not stand upon selfishness,

that stealing is not right in whatever form it appears,

that life and property are not after all the things we should aim at, and many other things.

We had schools too and teachers, quite different from what we see in your great West and now imitated in our land.

First of all, we never have thought of schools as shops for intellectual apprenticeship.

We were sent there not so much for earning a livelihood when we had finished with them, as for becoming true men, kunshi, as we called them, akin to gentlemen in English.

Then too we were not taught on a dozen different subjects at the same time.

We had only two lobes of the brain then as now, and not a dozen;

and our old teachers thought (we think, wisely,) that we must not be crammed with knowledges of all kinds in a few years.

This was one good feature of our old system of education.

We were taught considerable in History, in Poetry, in Manners;

but chiefly in Morals, and that of practical kind,

Morality of the speculative, or theosophical, or even of theological kind, was never forced upon us in our schools.

Our Buddhist scholars indeed, in their mountain recesses,

did dispute about the number of hairs upon the carapace of the fabulous turtle, and other subjects of hair-splitting nature;

but we who lived in the plains below, and had to deal with the practical affairs of men,

were spared from conscientious scruples about these and similar questions.

In a word, we were never taught in theology in our schools.

We had temples (churches) to resort to for that purpose, and our schools were free from the sectarian wranglings often witnessed in other lands.

This was another good feature of our old system of education.

Then also we were not taught in classes.

The grouping of soul-bearing human beings into classes, as sheep upon Australian farms, was not known in our old schools.

Our teachers believed, I think instinctively, that man is unclassifiable, that he must be dealt with personally, i.e. face to face and soul to soul.

So they schooled us one by one, each according to his idiosyncracies, physical, mental, and spiritual.

They knew every one of us by his name.

And as asses were never harnessed with horses, there was but little danger of the former being beaten down into stupidity, or the latter driven into valedictorians' graves.

The system of education, based upon the survival-of-the-fittest principles, as the modern one seems to be, was considered to be unfittest for making generous, man-loving kunshi (gentlemen).

In this respect, therefore, our old-time teachers agreed with Socrates and Plato in their theory of education.

So naturally the relation between teachers and students was the closest one possible.

We never called our teachers by that unapproachable name, professor.

We called them sensei, "men born before,"

so named because of their prior birth, not only in respect of the time of their appearance in this world, which was not always the case, but also of their coming to the understanding of the truth.

As such they claimed from us the highest veneration, akin to that which we were asked to show toward our parents and feudal lords.

Indeed, sensei, parents, and kimi (lord) constituted the trinity of our worshipful regard;

and the most vexing question for the Japanese youth was which he would save if the three of them were on the point of drowning at the same time, and he had ability to save but one.

It was considered, therefore, a virtue of the highest kind for deshi (disciples) to lay down their lives for the sake of their sensei (master);

while we never have heard of students dying for their professor in our modern regime of education.

It was this our idea of relationship between 'sensei' and 'deshi,'

which made some of us able to comprehend at once the intimate relation between the master and his disciples which we found in the Christian Bible.

When we found written therein that the disciple is not above his master, nor the servant above his lord; or that the good shepherd gives his life for the sheep, and other similar sayings,

we took them almost instinctively as things known to us long before;

and we often wondered how those Christians whose idea of master is only professor, and of disciple, only student, could have comprehended these teachings of the Scripture which they came to teach us.

We do not maintain of course that the old was superior to the new in every respect.

But we do maintain that the old was not all bad, and the new is not all good and perfect.

The new is yet to be much improved upon, and the old is yet to be resuscitated.

As yet we cannot advise ourselves to give up the Old and owe our allegiance to the new altogether."

So we expressed ourselves, as we still continue to express ourselves,

and we were not received with much applause.

They thought, that is, these Westerners did, that we were not so docile, and imitative and pliable, as they imagined we were.

That we may further maintain our "stubbornness," "non-receptivity," and "anti-foreignism," we give in this essay the life of a man whose name we revere as one of our ideal school-teachers (sensei).

Thereby we mean no more than to give a clue or two to those our good friends of the West who have the education of the Japanese youths at heart.

II. Early Years and Awakening to Consciousness.

It was in the year 1608 of the Christian era,

only eight years after the battle of Sekigahara, and seven years before the fall of Osaka,

when yet men's chief business was to fight, and women's to weep,

and letters and philosophies were thought unworthy to be pursued by practical men of the world,

that one of the saintliest and most advanced thinkers that Japan has ever produced was born in the province of Omi,

on the west bank of Lake Biwa, near which the Hira rears up its rounded head, and casts its shadow upon the glassy lake below.

Brought up mostly by his grand-parents, in the island of Shikoku, away from his paternal residence at Omi,

he early showed sensitiveness unusual in one of his age, and in the son of a samurai trained mostly in the arts of war.

It was in the eleventh year of his age that a text from Confucius' Great Learning roused in him an ambition which was to shape the whole of his future career.

Therein he read: From the emperor down to the commonest people, a man's chief aim is in the right ordering of his life.

"Here is this book, Oh Heaven be thanked," he then exclaimed;

"and can I not by attempting be a saint myself!"

He wept, and the impression remained with him through his life.

"Be a saint,"—what an ambition this!

But the boy was not a mere over-sensitive weakling, bent wholly upon prayers and introspection.

Once a mob attacked his grandfather's house, and he was among the first that rushed into their midst, a sword in his hand, and repelled them successfully,

and "then was calm as before."

He was but thirteen years of age then.

About the same year, he was sent to one Tenryo, a Buddhist priest of great learning, to be trained in the arts of poetry and hand-writing.

Of the many questions that the precocious youth put to his teacher, the following was very characteristic of him:

"You tell me," Toju said, "that when Buddha was born, he pointed one hand heavenward and the other earthward, and said, 'I alone of all beings in heaven above and under the heaven, am worthy of honor';

— is he not the proudest of men under heaven;

and how is it possible that my reverend master owns him as his ideal?"

The boy never liked Buddhism afterward.

His ideal was perfect humility, and Buddha was not such a man.

When he was seventeen, he was able to obtain the complete set of Confucius' Four Books, showing the scarcity of books at the time.

This whetted his appetite for learning more than ever,

and he was found devoting all his stray hours to the precious store of knowledge now in his possession.

At the time, however, when the samurai's chief business was to fight, and book-reading was despised as a work fitted only for priests and recluses,

the young Toju was compelled to carry on his study in all privacy.

His day-time was spent wholly in the use of arms, and he gave himself to his books only in the night-time.

But his secrecy was not to remain undiscovered.

One day, one of his comrades addressed him as "Confucius,"

in evident derision of his nightly devotion to his books, as well as of his benignant temper wholly exceptional among the rude combative youths of the time.

"You, ignoramus, you!" the gentle youth was now heard in indignation.

"Holy Confucius is dead now for two thousand years.

Meanest thou by that epithet to blaspheme the saint's name, or to deride me for my love of knowledge?

Poor fellow! War alone is not the samurai's profession, but the arts of peace as well.

An unlettered samurai is a chattel, a slave.

Art thou satisfied with thy being a slave?"

Toju's thundering had its effect.

The fellow owned his ignorance, and was silent ever afterward.

He was now twenty-two. His good grand-parents were no more,

and he had recently lost his father, with whom he had been only for a short time in his life.

Adversities made him more sensitive, tearful, and compassionate.

His sole concern was now his mother whom he left at Omi.

He was now daily growing in fame for his learning and purity of character, and honors and emoluments were waiting for him in abundance.

But to him a single woman, his mother, was weightier than all the world.

She was to claim his whole attention from this time on.

III. Mother-Worship.

His first attempt was to call his mother to his side, and to serve his lord in the province of Iyo.

In which failing he made up his mind to leave his lord, and to cling to his mother.

This conclusion he reached only after severe struggles in his mind.

He prepared a letter addressed to his lord's chancellor, wherein he stated the motives that induced him in his peculiar circumstance to prefer the service of his mother to that of his lord.

"I carefully weighed the two duties in my mind," was one of the sayings.

"My lord can invite with salaries any number of servants such as I, but my old mother has none to depend upon except my poor self."

His "trinitarian" scruples thus disposed of, he made his way to his mother's home,

leaving behind him all his possessions now amounting to a considerable sum in grain, houses, and furniture.

He was now by his mother's side, to his entire satisfaction; but means to comfort her was wholly wanting.

When he reached her home, he had only a hundred mon (one sen in our present currency) left.

With it he bought a little sake, and a scholar and sensei now turned himself into a pedler,

and went round the neighboring villages to sell the liquor with little interest in it;—all for his mother's sake.

Also he disposed of his sword, "the samurai's soul" and got ten pieces of silver for it.

This he lent out to the villagers; and a small interest coming therefrom was another source of supply to the humble existence of the little family.

The master felt not the slightest shame in all these menial labors.

His heaven was in his mother's smiles, and nothing was too costly to have one of these.

For two years he lived in this state of menial obscurity.

From what we gather from his writings, these were among the happiest years of his life.

Away from his mother, he could not very well sleep at night, "remembering her in my dreams, as I rolled from side to side upon my bed."

As we shall see afterward, his whole system of morality was centred in filial duty (孝, we shall call it filiality),

and lacking in this pivotal duty, he lacked in all, and hence his uneasiness.

His aim of life, we know what it was;

and to be a saint, a perfect man, was grander in his eyes than to be a scholar and philosopher.

But the world needed him in the latter capacity as well, and he was finally prevailed upon to give his knowledge to the public.

IV. The Saint of Omi.

He was twenty-eight years old, when leaving his pedlary business, he opened a school in his village.

Nothing was simpler then than to start a school.

His own house served as a dormitory, a chapel and a lecture-hall at the same time.

Confucius' image was hang up in the right place, and incense was burnt in his honors with due ceremonies by the master attended by his pupils.

Sciences and mathematics found no place in its curriculum.

The Chinese classics, some history, poetry-making and hand-writing constituted the whole of the topics then taught.

A modest, unseen business, this of school-teaching.

Its influence was felt only very slowly,—the work envied by angels, and despised by the show-loving men of the world.

Established there in that out-of-the-way section of the country, his life was a smooth continuity of peaceful enjoyment to its very close.

Only accidentally his name was brought to the public notice, as we shall see soon afterward.

Notoriety he hated above all things.

His mind to him a kingdom was, and he had his all, and more than all, within himself.

We hear of his taking constant interest in the affairs of his village; of his interceding for a villager prosecuted before the provincial court;

of his teaching in "the ways of man" the very coolies who carried him in a kago; and of a few such incidents preserved by his simple neighbors.

And such were in entire accordance with his views of life.

Here is what he said "on the accumulation of virtue":

"All men hate bad names, and love good names.

And as small deeds, unless accumulated, make not names, the small man takes no thought of them.

But the kunshi despises not small deeds that come to him day by day.

Great deeds he also does if they come in his way; only he seeks them not.

Great deeds are few, and small deeds are many.

The former make names; but the latter virtue.

The world seeks great deeds, because a name is what it loves.

If done for the name's sake, however, even great deeds become small.

A kunshi is he who makes virtue out of many small deeds.

Indeed, no deed is greater than virtue. Virtue is the source of all great deeds."

One thing was very peculiar in his teaching.

He made very much of virtue and character, and very little of letters and intellectual attainment in his pupils.

Here is his idea of what a true scholar is:

"'Scholar' is a name for virtue, not for arts.

Literature is an art, and a man with an inborn genius for it has no difficulty in becoming a man of letters.

But though proficient in letters, he is not a scholar if he lacks in virtue.

He is an ordinary person knowing letters.

An illiterate man with virtue is not an ordinary person. He is a scholar without letters."

For years, the teacher led a "mute inglorious life," unknown save to the narrow circle in his vicinity,

when Providence sought him out in his obscurity, and made him known to the world.

A young man started from Okayama to seek out a saint in the land, whom he might own as his sensei.

He had no better aim in this singular search than had the magi of old in their search after the King of the Jews.

On he sped toward the east, toward the capital of the country,

where, he naturally thought, can be found saints, as well as kings and other notables.

He came to Omi, and there stopped at a country hotel for a night.

In a room next to his, separated only by a thin partition, were two travellers, evidently of but recent acquaintance with each other.

The conversation they were engaged in attracted the youth's attention.

One of them, a samurai, was telling his experience on this wise:

"I had gone up to the capital on my lord's errand, and was on my way home entrusted with several hundred pieces of his gold.

I usually carried them close to my body; but on the day I reached this village, contrary to my usual custom, I fastened the purse to the saddle of the horse which I had hired for the latter part of the day.

I reached my hotel, and forgetful of the treasure on the saddle, I sent the horse away with its hetto,

and came to the knowledge of my fearful loss only some time afterward.

You can imagine the extremity to which I was driven.

I knew not the name of the hetto, and to seek him out was an impossibility.

Or even if I could, what availed me if he had disposed of the gold already.

My absence of mind was inexcusable.

There was but one way left of explaining myself to my lord."—(Human life was not very costly then).

"I prepared letters, one to the chancellor, and others to my relatives, and resolutely made up my mind for the last hour."

"While in this state of inexpressible anguish, now late in midnight, I heard somebody knocking hard at the hotel-door;

and I was soon informed that a man in a cooly's raiment wanted to see me.

I met him, and to my great amazement, he was no other than the betto who had carried me upon his horse that same afternoon.

'Sir Samurai:' he addressed me at once.

'I believe you left an important thing upon the saddle.

I found it after I reached my home, and I came back for the purpose of handing it to you.

Here it is.' So saying he placed the purse before me.

I knew not where I was; ecstasy transported me.

But recollecting myself, I said, 'Man, I owe my life to you.

Take a fourth of this as the price of my existence. You are to me another father.'

But the cooly was immovable.

'I am not entitled to any such thing.

The purse is yours, and it is entirely just that you should have it,'

So saying he would not touch the gold placed before him.

I forced upon him fifteen pieces, then five pieces, two pieces, and finally one piece, without success.

'As I am a poor man,' he said at last,

'pray give me 4 mon (4-hundredths of a cent) for a pair of straw-sandals, as I came all the way from my home four ris (10 miles) away for this special purpose.'

The utmost I could force upon him was only two-hundred mon (2 cents), and he was on the point of going gladly away.

Stopping him I said, 'Pray tell me what made you so unselfish, so honest, so true.

Never in this age have I thought of finding such honesty upon this earth.'

'There lives in my village of Ogawa,' the poor man answered, 'a man by the name of Nakae Toju, who teaches us villagers of these things.

He says gain is not the aim of life, but honesty, righteousness, and the ways of man.

We villagers all hear him, and walk by his teachings.'"

The young man heard the story.

He clapped his knee, and exclaimed, "Here is the saint I seek after.

I will go to him to-morrow morning, and be made his servant and disciple."

The day after he proceeded at once to Ogawa Village, inquired after the saint, and found him.

He confessed his purpose of coming there, and humbly implored the teacher to accept him into his discipleship.

Master Toju is surprised.

He is a village-teacher, and he is no man to be inquired after by a gentleman from a distant province.

He as humbly declines the young samurai's request.

The latter is importunate.

He would not move away from his sworn master.

But the teacher also is determined.

The stranger must be entirely mistaken, for he (Toju) is not a sensei for any but the village-children.

Now it was a rivalry between importunity and modesty, and both determined to hold its ground to the end.

As neither words nor entreaties could avail to win the master's favour, the samurai made up his mind to overcome the saint's modesty by sheer importunity.

So by the entrance-gate of the master's house, he spread his upper garment, and there in a posture befitting a gentleman, with swords on his side, and hands upon his knees, he sat,

exposed to the sun, dews and the comments of the passers-by.

It was summer-time, and mosquitoes are troublesome in those regions.

But nothing could break his upright posture as well as his heart bent upon its single aim.

For three days and nights, his silent request went up to the master within, without drawing from him a word of consent.

It was at this time that Toju's mother, his almighty mother, interfered in the youth's behalf.

Should such sincerity of request be turned away without acceptance on her son's part, thinks the mother.

Might he not just as well take the young man in to his discipleship, and be more honorable for so doing than not?

The master begins to reconsider the problem.

What his mother thinks right must be right.

He yields at last, and the samurai becomes his deshi.

The same was Kumazawa Banzan, the future financier and administrator of the powerful clan of Okayama, an introducer of many permanent reforms still visible in the land he superintended.

Had Toju no other disciple than this man, he would yet be remembered as one of the nation's greatest benefactors.

We need a separate essay for the pupil to fully appreciate the magnitude of the work now entrusted to the teacher's hand.

How does Providence bring to light, the gems that love the shadows of night!

One more episode finishes up all that is worth noting of the outward life of this silent man;

and that was a visit paid him by the Lord of Okayama, to whom Banzan, now his subject, communicated the grandeur of his master's character.

Such a visit was entirely exceptional at that time of rigid class distinctions;

and when we remember that Toju was yet an unknown man, and the daimio, one of the greatest in the land,

the visit was a condescension of the rarest kind, honorable, alike to him who paid it, as well as to him who called it forth.

Contrary to the expectation of the great daimio, however, he found the master and his village wholly unprepared to receive so great a guest.

With his large retinues, he proceeded to the master's residence, and found him there explaining the Book of Filiality to several of the village-children.

When it was announced that the Lord of Okayama was in for the special purpose of seeing him,

he sent back word that he would like the guest to wait for him at the house-entrance till the lecture was over.

Never before had the daimio received such strange treatment.

But there he waited, his whole retinues with him, while the teaching went on within, as if nothing special was going on outside.

The great guest was received with no more ceremony than that due to common humanity.

When asked to enter the Lord's service as his master and councillor, the teacher declined by saying that his mission was in his village, and with his mother.

The utmost the Lord succeeded in this extraordinary visit was a consent to have his name enrolled among the master's disciples, and a promise to have his eldest son sent to Okayama in his stead.

He who was so humble to a poor young man coming for his instruction was so dignified to a prince coming in all his glory.

He certainly was worthy of the name which the nation at large came to confer upon him, the Saint of Omi.

He became an object of universal admiration, and many other daimios came to him for the special purpose of having his counsels upon the affairs of their dominions.

Before closing this part of his otherwise very uneventful life, our Western readers would like to know of the master's relation to his wife,

as they seem to judge a man more by this relation than by any other.

He was a Confucian and a monogamist of the highest order.

In accordance with the injunction of the Chinese sage, he was married at thirty.

It so happened, however, that the lady who became his consort was not very remarkable for her physical beauty;

and the mother, solicitous of the disrepute his family might suffer, urged upon him remarriage, as such was not uncommon under similar circumstances.

But the mildest of sons who would hear to almost anything that his mother wished to have done, was disobedient in this case,

for he said, "Even the mother's word is not in force if contrary to Heaven's laws."

So the lady stayed with him all her life, gave birth to two children,

and was one of those typical Japanese wives "who shun all honors that their husbands may be honored thereby."

It was this spiritual beauty of hers that suggested to him an ideal womanhood as depicted in his brochure entitled "Instructions to Women."

Therein we read: "The relation of man to woman is that of Heaven to Earth.

Heaven is strength (virtus), and all things have their origin in it.

Earth is receptive. It accepts what Heaven makes, and nurtures them.

Herein is the harmony between a man and his wife. The former originates, and the latter completes, etc."

I believe Christianity itself has no objection against such consideration toward womankind.

V. The Inward Man.

His outward poverty and simplicity were out of all proportion to his inward wealth and variety.

He had a large kingdom within of which he was a perfect sovereign.

His outward tranquility was nothing but the natural result of his inward satisfaction.

Indeed we may say of him, as was said of another angelic man, that "he was nine parts spirit, and only one part flesh."

I wonder whether we with all our improved Soteriology and Eschatology are half so happy as this man was.

Only very recently his works were carefully edited and collected by two of his distant disciples,

and we have now before us ten good-sized Japanese volumes of his writings,

the whole opening up a vista before us of the soul that once was a reality among us,

at the time when we might almost suspect of the existence of systematic thought in Japan.

The books comprise a short sketch of his life, the reminiscence of his villagers about him, his commentaries upon the Chinese classics, lectures, essays, dialogues, letters, stray-thoughts, table-talks, and poems both Japanese (uta) and Chinese (shi).

We can do no more than to introduce our readers to what was in the man.

There were two distinct stages in his intellectual career.

The first was when he with his countrymen of the time was brought up in the conservative Chu philosophy, which above all other things, enforced ceaseless examination into one's own self.

We can imagine the sensitive youth made doubly sensitive by his constant introspection into the lack and weakness within himself,

and all the effects of undue self-examination are plainly visible in his early life and writings.

His Notes and Commentaries upon Great Learning, composed in his twenty-first year, was written under this mood.

We fear his natural modesty under the pressure of disheartening philosophy would have turned him into a morbid recluse, as it did many souls like him,

had not a new hope been reached out to him in the writings of that progressive Chinese, Wang Yang Ming.

We have had already some occasion to refer to this remarkable philosopher when we spoke of our great Saigo.

I think I am stating a well established fact in Japanese History when I state my own observation that the Chinese culture in the form of Yang-Ming-ism has never produced timid, fearful, conservative and retrogressive people out of us.

I believe all thoughtful critics of Confucius now agree that the sage himself was a very progressive man.

It was his retrogressive countrymen who construed him in their own light, and made him appear so to the world.

But Yang-Ming developed the progressiveness that was in Confucius, and inspired hopes in such as were inclined to understand him in that light.

The same helped our own Toju to see the sage in the new light.

The Saint of Omi was now a practical man.

Here are some of his Yang-Ming-isms:

"Press right on, though thy ways be dark; Skies may clear ere thy course is done."

"Tightly pull, man, thy heart's string, Prepare for a resolute march; A case is known of an arrow, Piercing through a flinty rock."

"He loves his life who his life forsakes For Ways that no like or higher know."

Who can make a quiet village-teacher out of these?

We have said he wrote commentaries upon the Chinese Classics.

Indeed these form by far the most important part of all his writings.

But let not our readers imagine that Toju was a commentator in the ordinary sense of that term.

He was a most original man, and his natural modesty alone made him resort to this kind of literature for expressing himself.

That he expressed perfect freedom in handling the ancient writings was evident from the words he often repeated to his pupils.

"These Discourses of the holy saints of old contain many things in them that are not applicable to the present state of society."

So saying, he made an expurgated edition of the same for use in his school.

Had he lived to-day, he would have made a fine subject for a heresy trial!

That he clearly made distinctions between man-made Laws (法, nomos) and the eternally-existing Truth (道, logos) is shown by the remarkable saying of his as follows:

"The truth is distinct from the law.

Many taking one for the other are greatly mistaken.

The law changes with time, even with saints in their land,—much more when transplanted to our land.

But the truth is from eternity.

Before the name of virtue was, the truth was and prevailed.

Before man was, space had it; and after he shall have disappeared, and heaven and earth have returned to nothingness, it will abide.

But the law was made to meet the need of time.

When time and place change, even saints' laws, if forced upon the world, are injurious to the cause of the truth.'

And this was spoken when the so-called Classical Books (経) were considered as inerrant as the Bible to the extreme inspirationists in our day.

Commentaries written in such a spirit as this cannot but be bold, striking and new.

Yet with all his fearlessness and independence, nothing was more remarkable in his ethical system than the foremost position he gave to the virtue of humility.

To him it was the primal virtue out of which all other virtues came, and without which a man lacked in all things.

"Unless the scholar first purges himself of his spirit and seek the virtue of humility, with all his learning and abundance of genius, he is not yet entitled to a position above the slough of low commonality."

"Fullness invites loss; humility is Heaven's law.

Humility is emptiness. When the mind is empty, the judgement of good and bad comes by itself."

Explaining the meaning of the word emptiness, he has this to say: "From of old, he that seeks the Truth stumbles at this word.

Because spiritual, hence empty; because empty, therefore spiritual. Consider this well."

As for attaining this hight of virtue, his method was very simple.

Said he: "If to cherish virtue is our aim, we are to do good day by day.

One good done, and one evil goes. Good daily done, evil daily goes.

Like as the day lengthens, the night shortens, we persevere in good, and evil all disappears."

And finding his supreme satisfaction in this emptiness in his soul, he has these words of pity to say of those who are not yet exonerated of selfishness in them:

"A prison there is besides prisons, Large enough to take in the world;

Its four walls, love of honour, Of gain, and pride, and desire—

Alas! So many among men, Chained therein, mourn evermore."

"Wish," desire, he despised in all its forms.

It was the predominance of this element in Buddhism that alienated him entirely from that faith.

That good is done with a reward as its aim, even though the reward lies in the future existence, was objectionable to him.

Righteousness with him needed no other incentive than itself.

The hope of future reward and existence, even if he had it, influenced him not in the slightest degree in his love of righteousness and enjoyment in the practice of the Heavenly Ways.

Writing to a mother who mourned over her son's leaving the Buddhist Faith to turn a Confucian, he has this to say:

"That you make so much of the future I can well understand.

But I wish you to note that if the future is so important, the present is still more so,

for if a man get astray in this life, it is all too probable that he will be forever lost in the life to come.

In a life so uncertain as this, where to-morrow is wholly unknown to us, nothing can exceed in importance our constant worship of the Buddha within our breasts, etc."

That he was not an atheist is abundantly shown by the profound respect he paid to the gods of the nation.

Only his faith was singularly free from "wishes" of all kind, except that of being righteous altogether.

And yet he seems to have enjoyed his life thoroughly.

In all his writings we fail to catch a single note of despondence.

Indeed, we with our own views of God and universe, can hardly imagine how this man with his Yang-Ming-istic form of Confucianism could have been so happy.

How everlastingly joyful the heart that could sing "On a Winter Day,"

"When once flowers ceased to be Objects of my heart's desire, How everlasting the Spring, That reigns in my bosom."

The following is in a similar strain:

"Little knew I that this life, With sorrows hard pressed, Could by Learning's benign help, Be spent in endless peace."

But he did not enjoy his life long.

His wife preceded him two years, and in the autumn of 1648, in his fortieth year, he died a death worthy of his life.

When he found that his end had arrived, he called his disciples together, assumed his usual upright posture, and said,

"I go away; see that my ways be not lost to the land;" and passed away.

The whole neighborhood went into mourning.

Deputies were sent by princes to render honor to the master.

His funeral was a national affair, and all that loved virtue and righteousness mourned the death so costly to the land.

Years afterward, the house he had lived in was repaired by his villagers, and is preserved to this day.

They made a god of his name, and observe two annual festivals in his memory.

You go to visit his grave, and a villager will guide you, not without a simple ceremonial robe cast over his shoulders.

You ask him why his respect thus paid to a man who lived three hundred years ago, and he will answer you on this wise:

"Here in this village and neighborhood, the father is kind to the son, the son filial to the father, and brothers are affectionate to one another.

In our homes no angry voices are to be heard, and all wear the countenance of peace.

All these we owe to the teachings and after-influence of the Master Toju, and we, one and all, revere his name with grateful remembrance."

And we of this age, with so much of our drum-beatings, trumpet-blowings, and newspaper-advertisements, that we might have "influence" over others,

may well learn of this man what the real secret of influence is.

If we cannot live quite as Toju did, who was no more conscious of his influence than the rose of its odor,

we may write and preach and howl and gesticulate all our lives, and yet nothing will remain of each one of us except "a mound of sod one tatami wide."

"There are saints scattered all over this land," Toju once said, "in the nook of valleys and sheltered by mountains;

and we cannot recognize them because they do not show themselves.

These are real saints, and those whose names sound in the world need not be counted as anything."

Happily or unhappily his name did "sound in the world," (much contrary to his wish, we know),

that we might all learn of him the power of a silent life if lived with a noble aim in view.

These saints were they who in their schools "in the nook of valleys" did preserve Old Japan from meannesses of all kinds;

and we know not whether our present system with virtues and geniuses all dabbed and professored, could as effectively keep down the meannesses so rife in our midst.

"The blood has all gone up to the head," they cry.

"The limbs are empty, and we shall soon die of apoplexy," if many Tojus appear not in the land.

前の章Ninomiya Sontoku — A Peasant Saint